commit 8c2c80207289b60d7764da245b13533eb1735075 Author: stephanshufelt Date: Wed Jan 1 11:17:19 2025 +0800 Add Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role diff --git a/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4bf6344 --- /dev/null +++ b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG)
The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites using both complimentary casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal [sports betting](https://bytes-the-dust.com/index.php/User:Joanne00U00530) levy, but sweepstakes [operators aren't](https://truthbook.social/read-blog/8628_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) based on regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.
+
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the company faces accusations of illegal [sports betting](https://www.athleticzoneforum.com/read-blog/770_missouri-sports-betting-ballot-measure-approved-by-voters.html) in a New york city claim that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'develop a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration below)
+
'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
+
Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of stars from [sports betting](https://skylockr.app/read-blog/209_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html) lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.
+
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes casinos found online
+
Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - but not all - video games are totally free
+
Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social networks
+
Find out more
+
Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
+
Instead, ads generally focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for actual gambling losses.
+
Others lure consumers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement revealing off Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.
+
'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the very first caption on the screen.
+
Another caption discussed: 'Because I never quit.'
+
The discrepancy in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.
+
A [representative](https://youtoosocialnetwork.com/read-blog/1288_how-to-attract-users-to-my-fantasy-sports-platform.html) for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for totally free.
+
'Most social sweeps consumers never buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'
+
Social casinos provide consumers a possibility to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be [exchanged genuine](https://kiigasofthub.com/read-blog/10096_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) money, but can be used to unlock numerous features within the games.
+
But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting customers to get other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.
+
And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.
+
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion
+
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement revealing off Drake's cars and trucks, planes and estates
+
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
+
Traditional online casinos are banned in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.
+
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require normally need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.
+
Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to [submit mail-in](https://we2chat.net/read-blog/26326_sport-betting-industry-wants-to-protect-itself.html) requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thereby giving them a factor to try their hands at any variety of casino video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.
+
So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to run in 48 states, while [online casinos](https://chateando.net/read-blog/230_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) are banned in all but 7?
+
According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a way of promoting their support.
+
'Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to pay for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.'
+
Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that provide them the opportunity to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.
+
And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself doesn't meet the meaning of gaming in the US.
+
'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all sort of daily companies in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
+
But to many [sports betting](https://chateando.net/read-blog/217_score-big-wins-how-sports-betting-software-drives-growth-and-engagement.html) market insiders, that argument does not cut it.
+
For starters, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
+
'They don't last forever and they're typically not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.
+
'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the characteristics typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payment percentage for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the revenue made by the business [generally less than one percent]'
+
Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the possibility to play casino-style video games for real prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have considering that been shuttered over allegations of unlawful [sports betting](https://www.opentx.cz/index.php/U%C5%BEivatel:LoreenDidomenico).
+
DJ Khaled is among several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
+
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must deal with similar scrutiny.
+
'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state chief law [officer](https://ifairy.world/read-blog/1361_online-betting-firms-gamble-on-soccer-mad-nigeria.html) as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited [sports betting](http://touringtreffen.nl/read-blog/2430_the-ins-and-outs-of-betting-on-the-nfl-draft.html).'
+
One of the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the concern.
+
'Consumers are being [deprived](https://www.jaitun.com/read-blog/15210_why-every-cricket-fan-need-to-try-the-all-cricket-id-gaming-platform.html) of defenses and states are forgoing significant tax and profits chances as this [sports betting](https://wiki.tld-wars.space/index.php/Utilisateur:TaneshaSchippers) replaces that carried out through [regulated](https://higgledy-piggledy.xyz/index.php/User:ValerieBoatwrigh) channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.
+
And after that there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.
+
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four [separate](https://globalairgunner.com/read-blog/20336_just-how-much-are-americans-investing-in-sports-betting.html) cases in Kentucky without [admitting](http://it-viking.ch/index.php/User:SaraP4853583338) any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, stating the settlement was made to [prevent legal](https://pittsburghpenguinsclub.com/read-blog/11628_things-you-need-to-learn-about-rafting-adventures.html) expenses and continued litigation.
+
Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
+
In the most recent lawsuit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '
+
Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.
+
'We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.
+
'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only great games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.
+
'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly typical throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely defend any claim which might be brought against us.'
+
The issues in between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos could prove troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.
+
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back [VGW's Global](https://www.proathletediscuss.com/read-blog/431_things-you-need-to-learn-about-rafting-adventures.html) Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
+
'It's paradoxical that [professional athletes](https://messengerkivu.com/read-blog/2394_the-history-of-the-nfl-and-how-to-bet-on-it.html) are hawking prohibited [sports betting](https://www.jaitun.com/read-blog/15168_best-u-s-sports-betting-sites-amp-sportsbooks-for-2024.html) 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the [leagues](http://woorichat.com/read-blog/10302_exploring-the-sports-betting-industry-putting-ideas-into-practice.html) wish to project a strong stance against [illegal](https://woodsrunners.com/index.php/User:BethKraker1) [sports betting](http://wiki.die-karte-bitte.de/index.php/Benutzer_Diskussion:StanleyBaughan) - specifically when trying to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
+
It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he [conspired](https://cittaviva.net/read-blog/21475_things-you-need-to-understand-about-rafting-adventures.html) with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or [sweepstakes casinos](http://social.redemaxxi.com.br/read-blog/1469_just-how-much-are-americans-investing-in-sports-betting.html).
+
In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting apparently unlawful gambling websites
+
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.
+
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.
+
Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.
+
Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to discuss to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.
+
'We have full confidence in our [influencer](https://social.midnightdreamsreborns.com/read-blog/13689_score-big-wins-how-sports-betting-software-drives-growth-and-engagement.html) and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our worths are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'
+
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.
+
'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious unlawful gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating unlawful gaming.'
+
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) \ No newline at end of file